CyAn1d3
I think ill have a beer.... or 2... thousand
Cookies: 34
Posts: 815
|
 |
« on: June 24, 2009, 07:13:37 PM » |
|
as promised yesterday, heres the next 3 concept schematics for yall to take a vote on. any ideas for name changes are welcome. there wont be a set time frame as to WHEN they will be completed as i will be doing this in my spare time... something that i dont have much of. (i plan on eventually doing all of these, but i just like to know where the community would like me to start.) vanity class  gladiator class  valentine/yamato galaxy refit  comparison shot  as always im open to suggestions for changes. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 19, 2010, 03:00:17 PM by CyAn1d3 »
|
Logged
|
 yeeeeaaaaa boy..... |
|
|
|
lmm086gf
Cookies: 22
Posts: 657
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2009, 08:10:07 PM » |
|
Oh, I like that Vanity.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All hail the messiah!
|
|
|
|
teleguy
Cookies: 24
Posts: 355
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2009, 08:17:33 PM » |
|
Me too. But I think the nacelles should be slimmer.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Lionus
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2009, 09:11:01 PM » |
|
Am I right if I assume that Gladiator-class is fulfilling similar role as Defiant? if that is so, then I'd say that go for the Gladiator-class, we need more ships like that to counter the annoyingly quick Dominion bugships.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Star Trek Quad-nacelle fanboy Extraordinaire
StarFleet Research and Development Crash Test Dummie/Test pilot
|
|
|
|
Starforce2
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2009, 09:35:01 PM » |
|
Am I right if I assume that Gladiator-class is fulfilling similar role as Defiant? if that is so, then I'd say that go for the Gladiator-class, we need more ships like that to counter the annoyingly quick Dominion bugships. I voted for it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CyAn1d3
I think ill have a beer.... or 2... thousand
Cookies: 34
Posts: 815
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2009, 09:51:22 PM » |
|
Am I right if I assume that Gladiator-class is fulfilling similar role as Defiant? if that is so, then I'd say that go for the Gladiator-class, we need more ships like that to counter the annoyingly quick Dominion bugships. yes, you would be right in assuming that. she would come out to be slightly bigger than a defiant, but with a bit more firepower. i also had the thought of implementing a replicating armour system similar to that of voyager's, (if its accepted by the community) on the vanity and the gladiator. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
yeeeeaaaaa boy..... |
|
|
FourChan
Starfleet Technologies Development Center
Cookies: 4
Posts: 691
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2009, 10:48:11 PM » |
|
We do need more Galaxy Class Variants.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
FarShot
I'm actually working on something!!!
Cookies: 31
Posts: 901
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2009, 03:46:43 AM » |
|
I vote for the Valentine, however I suggest a name change.
I for one am for the Yamato class, the lead ship being the USS Yamato NCC - 71807 - A.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CyAn1d3
I think ill have a beer.... or 2... thousand
Cookies: 34
Posts: 815
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 25, 2009, 05:31:24 PM » |
|
I vote for the Valentine, however I suggest a name change.
I for one am for the Yamato class, the lead ship being the USS Yamato NCC - 71807 - A.
sounds good to me, if i get enough votes for it. and other people like the suggestion too. anyone else like the idea? btw, im closing the poll on friday of next week |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 25, 2009, 07:36:47 PM by CyAn1d3 »
|
Logged
|
yeeeeaaaaa boy..... |
|
|
Karronade
Assimilate This!!
Cookies: 3
Posts: 26
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 28, 2009, 07:58:24 PM » |
|
I voted for the Gladiator class. It looks like a designevolution from the miranda class and I think that the other models have less new design than the Gladiator. The Vanity and new Arsenal class look too much like the Sovereign and the Valentineclass is a minorchanged Galaxy... So, I think the Gladiator will be the best choice, I like it. It would be cool to fly this ship InGame  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CyAn1d3
I think ill have a beer.... or 2... thousand
Cookies: 34
Posts: 815
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 29, 2009, 01:47:51 PM » |
|
ugh, i need more votes... this it too close ran.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
yeeeeaaaaa boy..... |
|
|
|
Ryles
Cookies: 0
Posts: 141
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 29, 2009, 08:29:41 PM » |
|
How about a blend of the Valentine and Vanity?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CyAn1d3
I think ill have a beer.... or 2... thousand
Cookies: 34
Posts: 815
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 29, 2009, 08:39:21 PM » |
|
How about a blend of the Valentine and Vanity?
hmmm..... *thinks* |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
yeeeeaaaaa boy..... |
|
|
|
GMunoz
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 29, 2009, 09:40:15 PM » |
|
I say Vanity (with name change)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JamesTiberiusKirk
Cheers!
Cookies: 33
Posts: 455
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 06, 2009, 09:30:25 AM » |
|
maybe change the shape of the vanity class bussards? I like their front look very much, but on top hmm well their just a triangle, a bit simple for me, i have some ideas... just have to get them to paper. lets hope that im not too lazy for it  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "And this... is... to go... even further beyond!" |
|
|
CyAn1d3
I think ill have a beer.... or 2... thousand
Cookies: 34
Posts: 815
|
|
« Reply #15 on: July 06, 2009, 12:10:50 PM » |
|
maybe change the shape of the vanity class bussards? I like their front look very much, but on top hmm well their just a triangle, a bit simple for me, i have some ideas... just have to get them to paper. lets hope that im not too lazy for it you certainly have the time now, the vanity has taken the #2 slot, seems the valentine/yamato is the first on the chopping blocks. thanks for the input and the votes fellas. ur input is ALWAYS appreciated. work will begin tonight on the Refit Galaxy, i will have first pics up when i get that far. again thanks guys! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
yeeeeaaaaa boy..... |
|
|
CyAn1d3
I think ill have a beer.... or 2... thousand
Cookies: 34
Posts: 815
|
|
« Reply #16 on: July 08, 2009, 12:28:17 AM » |
|
because my internet crapped out on me all day, i decided to bust a$* and get this started... well started is an understatement.... :lol: heres some eye candy! cookie, complaints, compliments are welcome! enjoy!       btw.. how the heck do i get an imprint of the top of the star drive on the underside of the saucer, ive tried booleans and probooleans.. needless to say after 7 (total) attempts, 3 crashes, 1 brain fart, and 3 no shows i gave up. any ideas? a galaxy aint a galaxy unless it can seperate, and i dont want some "smooth part" where the stardrive links with the saucer. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
yeeeeaaaaa boy..... |
|
|
DJ Curtis
Always look on the bright side of life.
Cookies: 543
Posts: 1904 Awards: MotM - Aug/2007, Jan/2008, Dec/2008, Jan/2009, Mar/2009, Nov/2009, Dec/2009, May/2010
|
|
« Reply #17 on: July 08, 2009, 12:37:12 AM » |
|
perhaps these wireframe shots of my galaxy will help.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CyAn1d3
I think ill have a beer.... or 2... thousand
Cookies: 34
Posts: 815
|
|
« Reply #18 on: July 08, 2009, 12:41:20 AM » |
|
yes indeedly doodly! thanks DJ! so i would be right in assuming its alot easier to just physically model it out instead of relying on maxs tools? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
yeeeeaaaaa boy..... |
|
|
|
Lionus
|
|
« Reply #19 on: July 08, 2009, 12:57:11 AM » |
|
are you going to give the saucer more firepower ( pulse phasers or perhaps even torps ), or will it remain as a big target with a bullseye painted on it? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Star Trek Quad-nacelle fanboy Extraordinaire
StarFleet Research and Development Crash Test Dummie/Test pilot
|
|
|
|
